A data-informed look at how three years of stair-climbing training, recall practice, and AARV(4) skill rehearsal came together in one single-case longitudinal self-study.
Educational scope: CNCBT is presented here as a personal training model and self-observation record, not as a scientifically validated treatment or medical protocol.
What changed after three years of stair-climbing training? The answer is organized into three domains: cardiovascular, neurological, and cognitive-behavioral.
21-floor ascents
floors climbed
hh:mm:ss
I started stair training in the 21-floor apartment where my family lived during my tenure with SOCKOR. My first goal was concrete: reduce LDL cholesterol and improve physical fitness.
From January 3, 2019, to December 31, 2021, I tracked my workouts in Excel spreadsheets. Those records unexpectedly became more than fitness logs. They helped me articulate a story I had been pursuing for two decades: the integration of aerobic exercise with cognitive-behavioral training.
CNCBT later became the name for this integration: cardiovascular exercise, memory practice, skill rehearsal, reflection, internalization, and behavior change.
The cardio layer of CNCBT is represented by the three-year 21-floor stair-climbing record. The table below summarizes the primary training load.
| Metric | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 3-Year Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total 21-SCE ascents | Ascents | 775 | 1,014 | 1,152 | 2,941 |
| Total floors | Floors | 16,275 | 21,294 | 24,192 | 61,761 |
| Total stairs | Stairs | 260,400 | 340,704 | 387,072 | 988,176 |
| Total time | hh:mm:ss | 54:29:08 | 55:31:03 | 67:18:35 | 177:18:46 |
| Average time/run | mm:ss | 04:23 | 03:20 | 03:28 | 03:44 |
Over three years, the training totaled 988,176 stairs, or 61,761 floors—roughly equivalent to ascending the Empire State Building 605.5 times.
In my personal records, LDL cholesterol decreased from 167.7 mg/dL to 103.4 mg/dL over 18 months, alongside exercise and dietary change, with no medication used.
Cardio training became the platform for cognitive learning, skill rehearsal, and the later development of CNCBT.
Section 2 · Neuro
Between April–September 2019 and April–October 2021, I used stair climbing as a structured recall-training platform. During each climb, I listened to lectures from An Economic History of the World since 1400 and practiced encoding, rehearsal, and retrieval.
| Metric | 2019 Apr–Sep |
2021 Apr–Oct |
Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average recall at start | 22.3 | 43.6 | Higher starting baseline in 2021 |
| Average recall at peak | 49.8 | 55.8 | Improved maximum retrieval capacity |
| Average recall at end | 47.9 | 55.8 | Stronger retention across the training period |
| Largest single-session recall | 80 | 73 | High peak performance maintained |
| Smallest single-session recall | 4 | 19–30 | Improved minimum performance range |
| Total training ascents during recall period | 508 | 643 | Increased exposure to training cycles |
| Recall consistency | Variable | More stable | Reduced performance fluctuation |
Note: Recall exercise was skipped in August 2021 due to severe weather conditions inside the stairwell.
21-floor climbing
Learn and organiz
Recall after ascent
Repeat the cycle
Improve over time
Recall vs AARV(4)
The recall exercises helped prepare my brain to become more receptive to AARV(4) coping skills by strengthening cognitive endurance, attentional control, and retrieval under pressure.
Encoding → Rehearsal → Retrieval
Memory-centered learning: the goal was to take in information, rehearse it while climbing, and recall it at the top before it faded.
Encoding → Embodying → Retrieval → Reflection → Internalization
Skill-automation learning: the goal was to encode coping scripts, embody them through breath, posture, and behavior, retrieve them under activation, and internalize them as usable responses.
Section 3 · TOVA
The Test of Variables of Attention is a computerized attention measure often used in clinical assessment contexts. Here, the scores are presented only as part of my personal training record.
| Metric | 2019 07/09/2019 | 2020 07/07/2020 | 2022 07/12/2022 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attention Performance Index | 3.96 | 5.14 | 4.31 | Improved overall attention; maintained above baseline |
| D Prime, Half 2 | -0.14 | 0.33 | 0.00 | Better signal detection, later normalized |
| Response-time variability, total | 111 | 117 | 109 | Improved consistency by 2022; lower is generally better |
| Response time, total | 143 | >140 | 139 | More controlled processing pattern |
| Commission errors, total | 99 | 109 | 103 | Stable accuracy pattern |
| Omission errors, total | 105 | 105 | 105 | Stable sustained attention pattern |
Together, the data suggest a plausible association between repeated aerobic exertion, cognitive-load training, and improved attention stability in this single-case record. They do not establish causation.
Section 4 · One Million Stairs Later
Over three years, I climbed nearly one million stairs while training my brain at the same time. The stairs became more than exercise: they became a moving classroom and later a training ground for emotional regulation.
In simple terms, CNCBT helped me train brain and body together. Stair climbing strengthened the body. Recall practice strengthened attention and memory. AARV(4) strengthened emotional regulation through repeated practice.
Section 5 · AARV(4) CBT Training
AARV(4) training used a six-ascent structure. Each ascent became a practice block for one skill or skill cluster, followed by reflection and internalization.
Six ascents of 21 floors, repeated on each training day.
Approximately four minutes per ascent.
Awareness; Acceptance; Relaxation; Active Listening + Accurate Reflection; Normalization + Problem-Solving; all combined.
Post-ascent self-evaluation, error correction, and cognitive restructuring.
Organizing the trained skills into a personally meaningful sequence.
Section 6 · Six-Ascent Cycle
The six-ascent model organized each training day into a sequence of focused skill blocks.
Identify situations that resemble previous anger triggers and focus on bodily, behavioral, emotional, and cognitive cues.
Acknowledge discomfort from the fight-or-flight response and recognize the response as yours to manage.
Use breathing, facial tension release, posture, vocal control, and grounding to soothe the sympathetic nervous system.
Listen without interrupting, then summarize and mirror the other person’s thoughts and feelings without distortion.
Affirm what makes sense in context, define a shared goal, and discuss concrete next steps.
Bring the previous skills together and reinforce them as a cohesive response set.
Section 7 · Cognitive-Behavioral Training Cycle
The cognitive-behavioral training cycle gives each session a complete learning path: prepare, encode, embody, retrieve, reflect, internalize, and record.
Mental preparation for the task: briefly review the scripted AARV(4) skill, clear the mind, and focus on the specific practice block.
Envision it. Breathe. Begin.
Understand the concept and load it into short-term and working memory, like writing new code.
Encode. Repeat. Make it stick.
Turn the concept into physical practice—breathing, posture, words, and actions—so mental patterns become bodily patterns.
Think it. Feel it. Live it.
Pull the skill from memory while the body is exerting itself, strengthening the memory and the neural circuits that support it.
Retrieve. Apply. Grow.
Look back on what happened physically, cognitively, and emotionally, then draw lessons through self-assessment and cognitive restructuring.
Pause. Reflect. Get better.
Write down what you learned in your own words so it becomes personally meaningful and more likely to settle into long-term memory.
Own it. Mean it. Retain it.
Record-keeping turns practice into visible progress. Over time, accumulated records can motivate continued effort and reveal patterns that were not obvious day to day.
Track it. See it. Stay motivated.
Section 8 · 5-Level ERS
Emotional regulation can be observed, rated, tracked, and strengthened through practice.
The 5-Level Emotional Regulation Scale is a structured, skill-based SUDS. It begins with self-rating, but becomes more useful when tied to clear behavioral anchors, repeated consistently, and recorded over time.
| Level | Scale | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Optimal regulation | Distress is recognized early and managed effectively. The person remains grounded, functional, and communicates appropriately while using AARV(4) skills consistently. |
| 4 | Effective regulation | Noticeable discomfort is present, but composure and functioning are largely maintained. Several AARV(4) skills are used to reduce escalation and recover relatively quickly. |
| 3 | Moderate regulation | Distress interferes with thinking, mood, or communication. Some AARV(4) skills are used inconsistently, but major escalation or shutdown is avoided. |
| 2 | Struggling | Distress significantly disrupts functioning, relationships, or concentration. Limited AARV(4) skills are used with partial effectiveness, and distress may persist for hours. |
| 1 | Dysregulated | Distress becomes overwhelming and difficult to manage. There is little or no use of AARV(4) skills, and functioning, communication, or behavior is significantly impaired. |
This scale is an educational self-monitoring tool from a single-case CNCBT self-study. It is not a diagnostic or peer-reviewed clinical measure.
Section 9–10 · Results
From January 2 to May 13, 2020, training frequency increased and ERS ratings shifted upward in my personal records. The chart below shows monthly training frequency and average ERS score.
AARV(4) organized each practice block into a clear sequence rather than vague intention.
Repeated practice made improvement visible as a behavioral pattern, not only as a subjective impression.
Section 11 · Before and After
The Blueberry Incident and Toilet-Cleaning Incident show two different outcomes in the same home with the same person. One illustrates failed regulation; the other illustrates applied AARV(4).
| AARV(4) Skill | Blueberry Incident | Toilet-Cleaning Incident |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness | Did not recognize the escalation soon enough | Recognized the trigger and the choice point |
| Acceptance | Defended against the criticism | Admitted that I forgot and accepted my carelessness |
| Relaxation | Emotion drove the response | Stayed calm despite fatigue and stress |
| Active Listening | Did not remain open to the message | Listened without interrupting or counterattacking |
| Accurate Reflection | Did not reflect the other person's experience | Reflected that the stains were unpleasant to see and clean |
| Normalization | Did not validate what made sense | Validated why the situation was frustrating and unpleasant |
| Problem-Solving | Withdrawal replaced constructive action | Accepted responsibility and prevented further escalation |
Section 12 · The Invitation
Every instance of uncontrolled anger drains energy that could have been used to build, connect, or grow. We are always expending emotional energy; the real question is whether we are squandering it or directing it toward something meaningful.
Take a moment today to evaluate where your energy is going. Redirect it intentionally. What you do with your emotional energy shapes everything that comes next.
CNCBT and AARV(4) are presented as educational concepts based on a personal single-case longitudinal self-study. They are not medical advice, psychotherapy, a peer-reviewed clinical treatment, or a substitute for care from a qualified professional.
Because CNCBT involves physical exertion, readers should choose a safe exercise platform and consult a healthcare professional before beginning physically demanding training, especially if they have medical conditions, injuries, cardiovascular risk, dizziness, pain, or other safety concerns.
This website presents CNCBT and AARV(4) as educational training concepts and a personal self-study story. It is not a scientific claim that the method will produce the same results for others.
The content is not medical advice, psychotherapy, diagnosis, treatment, or a crisis service. Results vary. Physical training should be medically appropriate, safe, and adapted to the reader’s health status and physical ability.
Repeated exposure to any cognitive test can create familiarity with the testing format. When discussing TOVA scores, avoid claiming that CNCBT caused the results. The safest language is that the results were observed in a personal record and may reflect multiple influences, including training, familiarity with the task, attention, health, sleep, motivation, and testing conditions.